behzad mohammadian; hassan zarei matin; jabbar babashahi; hamidreza yazdani
Abstract
Extended abstract
1- INTRODUCTION
Humility-based leadership is a style which is based on virtue. A virtue that is deeply rooted in the beliefs and basic assumptions of staffs. Theoretical development and empirical findings about this subject is very poor. The traces of recent organizational scandals ...
Read More
Extended abstract
1- INTRODUCTION
Humility-based leadership is a style which is based on virtue. A virtue that is deeply rooted in the beliefs and basic assumptions of staffs. Theoretical development and empirical findings about this subject is very poor. The traces of recent organizational scandals have been blamed on arrogance, sense of selfishness and self-righteousness of the managers. Virtues such as humility have faced with an incresingly interest in organizational studies. The aim of this study is to provide a conceptual model of components, requirements and outcomes of humility-based leadership.
2- THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Humility-based leadership is a style which is based on virtue. It is a penetrating feature that allows a person to fit and even prevail in a particular society. Humility has been defined as possessing a multi-dimensional construct, which includes the passion for self-assessment (i.e., self-awareness and recognition of constraints), orientation and tendency to others (againest self-centred), interpersonal acceptance, the ability to regulate the emotions of others, and confirmation and appreciation of the value of creatures. Humble leadership is recognized as the acknowledgment of individuals’ limitations, highlighting the strengths of others and readiness to learn from models. Here it is assumed that this set of behaviors helps to reduce the social distance between leaders and followers through the promotion of bilateral exchange relations. Initially, with the acknowledgment of individual limitations, a leader will be able to stay close to the subordinates.
3- METHODOLOGY
The philosophy of research is interpretive, its approach is meta-synthesis and its strategy is grounded-theory, which is carried out qualitatively and through data collection using the instrument of documentation. Meta synthesis is qualitative analysis of concepts in previous studies using the common coding method in qualitative research and qualitative strategies such as grounded theory.
4- RESULTS & DISCUSSION
Analysis have shown that the main phenomenon (humility-based leadership) consists of four components: self-awareness, coaching, mentoring, and teachability. The first component of the definition of humility is the desire to engage enthusiastically in an influential process called self-awareness. In case of the second component, theorists have recently suggested that modesty is a driving force for credible service and leadership. The third essential component of humility is the ability to learn (experiential, responsive). As humility is rooted in development tendencies, this component also has implicit beliefs about the utility of learning and its potential for self-development.
5- CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS
For further research, future researchers are advised to study the process of forming this leadership style in a variety of quantitative and qualitative ways. Reviewing the personality characteristics of these leaders can also significantly contribute to organizational growth. It is suggested that researchers investigate the impact of this phenomenon on other behavioral structures such as organizational citizenship behavior, organizational vocation, and organizational learning.
ali hamidi zadeh; hasan zaraei matin; mohsen khandel
Abstract
In the face of intensifying global competition and the explosion of knowledge, organizations around the globe are trying to maintain and improve their competitive position by strengthening their ability to deploy and utilize tangible and intangible assets. Increasingly the ability of organizations to ...
Read More
In the face of intensifying global competition and the explosion of knowledge, organizations around the globe are trying to maintain and improve their competitive position by strengthening their ability to deploy and utilize tangible and intangible assets. Increasingly the ability of organizations to maintain a competitive advantage depends on their successfull management of intangible assets such as human skills and knowledge. Survival in such a complex and uncertain environment is only possible by obtaining superior organizational performance which requires paying attention to factors affecting organizational performance. In this direction, strategic planning and corporate entrepreneurship are among the factors that will improve organizational performance. The world's second gas reserves and half of the gas reserves of the Middle East are in possession of Iran. The strategic importance of this resource in national development, meeting the needs of society and the global energy gives a specific rank to Iran. The use of this special privilege requires a comprehensive plan to gain maximum benefits for our country. Considering the importance of organizational learning and innovation in organizational performance, the problem that is often seen in the gas companys is lack of up-to-date knowledge, database, innovation and the leading spirit in this strategic industry. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of strategic factors and entrepreneurship on organizational performance.
2- THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Organizational performance is a complex phenomenon, and perhaps the simplest interpretation for it is the collection activities directed towards achieving organizational goals. In this respect, organizational performance concerns with how an organization reaches its goals. Organizations must be able to identify indicators of organizational performance in difficult conditions that could provide respond to new problems with maximum speed. Entrepreneurship and strategic management are two dynamic processes that affect the behavior and performance of the company. It is claimed that the dynamic capabilities of the new paradigm are emerging in the field of entrepreneurship and strategic management. Organizational learning and innovation are considered as two dynamic capabilities that are essential for fostering entrepreneurship. Organizational learning and innovation simultaneously integrate a series of strategic factors (i.e., personal mastery, Transformational leadership, shared vision, proactivity, and environment).
3- METHODOLOGY
Since the purpose of this research is determining the causal relationships between strategic factors, entrepreneurial (organizational learning and innovation) and organizational performance, this research in terms of aim is a kind of applied study and in terms of data collection method is a kind of descriptive - correlation research. Because of the specificity of frame sampling and universality of behavior for all members of the society, simple random sampling method was used. Statistical population of the persent study was all managers and employees of Bandar Abbas Gas Company (N=400), and based on Morgan table, 196 persons were selected. This tool is a questionnaire and was used to analyze the data collected from smart-pls2 software.
4- RESULTS & DISCUSSION
The results of this study show that personal mastery has a direct and meaningful impact on organizational learning, but had no significant effect on organizational innovation. The direct impact of transformational leadership and proactivity on organizational learning and and innovation was confirmed but no direct impact of environment's shared vision on organizational learning and innovation was verified. The study also showed that organizational learning has a significant and direct impact on organizational innovation, and that organizational learning and innovation have a significant and direct impact on organizational performance.
5- CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS
If managers design and implement individual development plans and training needs assessment softwares, then they can hire employees with a higher level of personal mastery because the development of personal mastery enable members of organization to be faster and more initiative and responsibile in both learning and innovation. Transformational leadership possibility of creating a shared vision, strategy formulation and organizational structure enable organizations to meet the challenges of the knowledge of society. Therefore, it is recommended that the gas company managers provide the possibility of formation of quality circles to evaluate quality services to clients and that a proposed comprehensive system in the context of software be designed and implemented. Organizational commitment to personal mastery and leadership can be very naive and foolish if leaders are not able to create a shared vision. To improve shared vision it is recommended that the manager of Gas Company increase the participation of employees in meetings and conferences to explain and clarify what they want to create. Managers can play an important role in conceting the organization to the environment by deploying a performance-based recruitment system and a compensation system in gas companies, which can result in gaining support and acceptance from the environment for innovation and organizational learning. When that organization's mission, customers, capacity and strategies are determined, organizational learning can lead to radical innovation in products, services and organization processes, and finally increase organizational performance.